Search for: "Courts v. Smart"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 10:15 am
As a former chief judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, I understand the challenges of overseeing smart, independent, and strong-willed judges, and I’ve gained a somewhat unique perspective on the ongoing saga, albeit as an outsider. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:44 am
In Farina v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:08 am
The Modesto Bee offers this report, which begins: "Modesto City Council elections are in the hands of a whip-smart, 20-something Supreme Court clerk who is powerful and anonymous. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:01 pm
In reaching its decision, the Court recognized that there is an immense amount of personal information on smart phones and held that access to that information would constitute a significant invasion of individual privacy. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:45 pm
Last week, there was a lot of press coverage about a Virginia court ruling on how the Fifth Amendment applies to bypassing a smart phone passcode. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:28 pm
Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
The Court heard submissions in Kevin Fearon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
On this point, the Court of Appeal chose a test different from the one applied at first instance, applying the test from the Supreme Court decision in the case of Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Group Litigation v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:43 pm
In probably the best-written copyright opinion so far this year, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday, in Meshwerks v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:21 am
On January 5, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals published a split opinion in Nuculovic v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Chimel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
There are some darn smart people on the California Supreme Court (and in their chambers).Take today's opinion, for example. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
This morning the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) gave its ruling in Case T‑250/13 Naazneen Investments Ltd v OHIM, Energy Brands, Inc. intervening. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 pm
The ruling in Riley v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:58 am
Mosaic Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:36 pm
In Seldon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm
Reagan Seidler, Law Society of Upper Canada, Smart & Biggar, has published The Law of Haunted Houses: A Comment on Stigmatized Properties following Wang v Shao 54 (2) UBC Law Rev. 455 (2021). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:20 pm
By Michael Borella -- Three years ago, the Supreme Court's Alice Corp. v. [read post]
