Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 1,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 9:51 am
And it's important to remind people that, especially if (as here) both the trial court and -- even on appeal -- the California Attorney General's Office believe otherwise. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Benson), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Feb. 25, 2009), reads Prop. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:06 am
 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of bribery as charged on the theory that he offered money to a Superior Court judge to influence a grand jury, (2) the court made improper evidentiary rulings related to the disappearance of the defendant's former wife, and (3) the court improperly limited his cross-examination of a state's witness. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:55 am
On March 31, 2008, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, decided the case Detective Sergeant Dean Ackermann v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am by Graham Smith
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am by Graham Smith
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  By default, the Supreme Court’s split on the issue allows the Superior Court en banc decision to stand. [read post]