Search for: "Crow Tribe of Indians"
Results 61 - 80
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 7:41 am
United States case in which SCOTUS held that the Crow Nation did not possess the Big Horn River. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm
Wyoming, "Whether Wyoming's admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians' 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the 'unoccupied lands of the United States,' thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Wyoming, 17-532 Issue: Whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States,” thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 2:49 am
As late as 1948, two states (Arizona and New Mexico) had laws that barred many American Indians from voting, and American Indians faced some of the same barriers as blacks, until passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1965, including Jim Crow-like tactics and poll taxes. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 9:48 am
Crow Tribe of Indians Legislative Attorney, Crow Agency, M.T. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Crow Tribe of Indians Legislative Attorney, Crow Agency, M.T. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:57 am
The Fort Thompson office serves the Crow Creek and Lower Brule Indian Reservations in South Dakota and Brule, Buffalo, Hughes, Hyde, Lyman, Stanley and Sully counties in South Dakota. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:41 am
2017-10-05 Herrera Cert Petition Question presented: Whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States,” thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:50 am
Here are the documents and materials in the matter of Crow Indian Tribe et al v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:08 am
Here: 2017-10-05 Herrera Cert Petition Question presented: Whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States,” thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 5:37 am
Florey Denying Disgorgement: The Supreme Court’S Refusal To Grant The Crow Tribe Relief, Alex Galliani Untangling The Court’S Sovereignty Doctrine To Allow For Greater Respect Of Tribal Authority In Addressing Domestic Violence, Lauren Oppenheimer [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Denying disgorgement: The Supreme Court’s refusal to grant the Crow Tribe relief. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Crow Tribe of Indians, 471 U.S. 845, 855 (1985). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (Indian Country Jurisdiction) on 7/3/17. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 5:49 am
Tribes represented at the roundtable include: the Crow Nation, Chickasaw Nation, Ute Tribe (U&O Reservation), Southern Ute, Navajo Nation, Hopi, Three Affiliated Tribes of Ft. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:42 am
But most Indian tribes are not energy tribes, and most Indian people are not supportive of natural resources extraction. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:19 am
The State has opposed land into trust applications by the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, the Sisseton-Wahpeton Tribe, the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, and the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 7:03 am
Box 340, Crow Agency, MT 59022. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 5:51 am
In addition, all of the MT tribes, including Crow and N. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Sioux Tribe. [read post]
