Search for: "Crystal D. Peters" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 8:49 am by Mandelman
Upon reading the piece written by Peter Cohan for Daily Finance, I was presented with the answer to at least two of my questions, and quite likely my third as well. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:32 am by Peter Hirtle
(by Peter Hirtle)On p. 195 of Copyright & Cultural Institutions (C&CI), I noted that “Court cases involving copyright infringement by cultural heritage institutions are rare. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
(Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Patent minefield now a risk for trademark owners - District Court E D Missouri applies MedImmune in Express Scripts Inc v Intel Corp. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) CAFC to hear inequitable conduct case en banc: Theresense, Inc v Becton Dickinson and Co (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas holds ResQNet does not require admission of license agreements arising out of litigation: Fenner v HP (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court S D Texas: False marking fine set at point above gross… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:47 am
They’d just won third prize in the Westminster Dog of the Year competition and Nick’s comment was, “Crumpet and I are very pleased to be on the podium, but used to coming third in Westminster! [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(not precedential) (TTABlog) District Court W D Wisconsin: Trek trademark infringement... dismissed! [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(not precedential) (TTABlog) District Court W D Wisconsin: Trek trademark infringement... dismissed! [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Favre (Michigan State), Katherine Anne Meyer (Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C.). [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Court not required to review products during claim construction: SP Techs. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Court not required to review products during claim construction: SP Techs. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 6:32 pm
She may yet draw me back in with a more serious argument, but I’d be surprised. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:09 pm
--that was supposed to make her look crazy and just made her look like she was on crystal meth. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Wellesley, MA; Paula D'alessandro, President) Beks, Inc. [read post]