Search for: "Curtis v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Michael Oykhman
Reasonable Justification The Supreme Court in R v Natarelli,1967 CanLII 11 (SCC) indicated that the ultimate burden of persuasion is on the Crown to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of any reasonable justification or excuse. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Michael Oykhman
Reasonable Justification The Supreme Court in R v Natarelli,1967 CanLII 11 (SCC) indicated that the ultimate burden of persuasion is on the Crown to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of any reasonable justification or excuse. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Judgment was handed down in favour of the applicant in CURTIS v JASON VICTOR BISHOP TRADING AS CANBERRA NOTICE BOARD (Civil Dispute) [2022] ACAT 59 over defamatory material that was published on the Canberra Notice Board Facebook group between 15 June 2020 to 15 July 2020. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:39 am
Sources: https://www.cookcountyclerkil.gov/vital-records/marriage-civil-union/marriage-equality https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/high-court-signals-roe-v-wade-reversal-states-eye-sex-marriage-protect-rcna11645 https://www.lgbtmap.org/img/maps/citations-parents-de-facto.pdf Read More [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:01 am by Shayan Karbassi
  While it remains unclear whether the blocking statute has any teeth, a December 2021 European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling in Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by NARF
City of Tulsa (Criminal Jurisdiction; Curtis Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing Authority v. [read post]