Search for: "D.J. Close"
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Sept. 6, 2013), decision available here.Players: Decision by Judge Milan Smith, joined by D.J. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:20 pm
James Bass, CFO of the Texas Department of Transportation, D.J. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:41 am
Much like the AP yesterday, our twitter @justicebuilding was also hacked yesterday. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 7:58 am
D.J. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 1:04 am
It is not just the uncertainty due to a Presidential election that remains extremely close. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:35 am
Oh yes, the fact that the prosecutor used racial prejudice in his closing just added to the prejudice. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
Constitutional law students know that laws that discriminate based on alienage must satisfy strict (or close) judicial scrutiny in order to satisfy the Constitution. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:00 pm
Here the defendant was oh-so-close to finishing out his SR term. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:20 am
At best, the Court of Appeals thought this was a close case. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Factor in an improper and inflammatory closing by plaintiff’s counsel and an $18 million verdict, and you have the “worst drug/device product liability decision of 2011. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:50 pm
Fletcher and Zouhary, D.J.).The defendant sent a letter when he was running for Congress as a Republican. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:35 am
D.J. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
Noriega-Perez, No. 10-50501 (2-1-12) (Tallman with Fernandez; partial dissent by Moore, D.J.).It is hard to find renters now a-days. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
D.J.).The defendant tried to export defense articles without a license. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Bowman and D.J. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
D.J.; dissent by Berzon).This is a computer search case redux. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:30 am
The Second Circuit (Raggi, Jacobs [in dissent] and Rakoff [D.J.]) reinstates the verdict. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:09 am
Them's the breaks in a world of closely-divided Supreme Court rulings. [read post]
