Search for: "D.J.2"
Results 61 - 80
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2020, 11:48 am
D.J England, Jr. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:36 pm
Ceballos, No. 09-50502 (11-7-11) (Per curiam with Silverman, Wardlaw, and Sessions, D.J.) [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:54 pm
Smith, joined by Judges Carlos Bea and D.J. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 10:33 am
” Id. at *2. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
.: “‘Psychic’ Sally Morgan Sues Critics for £150,000 After Refusing $1 Million to Prove Her Powers” [D.J. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
The Aspen media (2 papers, 2 radio stations) are guaranteed seats. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 4:38 pm
Summary judgment is affirmed on the discrimination claim.2. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Carney and Stanceu [D.J.]) is not sure about this.We are not so certain that where, as here, the state expressly classifies inmates on the basis of religion in the prison context, a plaintiff challenging the state’s express classification on Equal Protection grounds must show either (1) that she was treated differently than members of a similarly situated group, or (2) that the state’s express classification was the result of… [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:54 am
§ 825.115(e)(2). [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:47 am
In that portion of the case, the Court of Appeals (Bianco, Carney and Komittee [D.J.]) said that even there were a First Amendment violation (the speech being the middle finger), the defendants have qualified immunity because the law was not clear at the time whether university officials can discipline students for actions like this. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Leval and Furman [D.J.]) notes that staff knew about plaintiff's need for the ASL accommodation, as plaintiff and her husband had repeatedly asked nurses for an interpreter. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 10:47 am
Argueta-Rosales, No. 14-50384 (4-12-16)(Fisher and Foote, D.J., with a partial concurrence and dissent by Bybee). [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:28 am
Citing the ministerial exception, the district court dismissed the case on summary judgment, and the Second Circuit (Sack, Lohier and Woods [D.J.]) affirms.Judge Sack provides a comprehensive overview of the ministerial exception, drawing from Supreme Court and other authorities in noting that the values promoted by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (prohibiting gender and other forms of employment discrimination) clash with the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses of the First… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:31 am
Village Green Realty, decided on June 2. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:54 am
But as the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Pooler and Reiss [D.J.]) writes:McCulloch presents no evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that the Defendants harbored animus against Hispanics, or that animus played a role in the restrictions imposed on McCulloch’s subdivision. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 6:16 am
The Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Bianco and Reiss [D.J.]) rules that the district court resolved disputed facts in dismissing the case.The district court first got it wrong in holding plaintiff to the "but-for" causation standard at the prima facie portion of the case. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:53 am
2. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
The district court dismissed Kelleher's case, the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Leval and Furman [D.J.]) brings it back. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:14 am
This instruction was proper, the Court of Appeals (Chin, Carney and Sannes [D.J.]) holds, in light of Brinks v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:16 am
In the end, the entire case got dismissed because Jefferson was unable to pay the $300.00.The Court of Appeals (Calabresi, Droney and Underhill [D.J.]) reinstates the case and vacates the sanction to boot. [read post]
