Search for: "DAVIS V US"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the consolidated cases of Davis v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Davis, which was decided last month. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:34 am
Then the case can go the way of Herrera [v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:27 pm
” Coolidge v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:45 am
Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:30 pm
Share On Friday, June 24, the court ruled in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:30 am
By contrast, Plessy v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:33 pm
Davis is allowed to show up via telephone. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:49 pm
Davis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
Biggs claimed that despite the act’s passage, US Attorney General Merrick Garland told Marshals to “avoid arresting protestors” at the homes of multiple Supreme Court Justices after a leaked copy of the court’s proposed ruling in the abortion rights case Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:50 am
Garamendi and Crosby v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:46 pm
Judge Bush held that a tiers-of-scrutiny analysis should be used, but that Davis' conduct does not survive even rational basis review.In a related case, Miller v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
While Vargas was moving through one court, Davis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:52 am
[v] Id. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 7:47 pm
Davis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:08 pm
In Phoenix Licensing v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:35 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
The justices further concluded that the Court should overrule Davis v. [read post]