Search for: "DAVIS v. JACOBS" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Davis & Gilbert, LLP, 126 AD3d 656, 656 (1st Dep’t 2015); Stackpole v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
In The New Yorker, Lincoln Caplan weighs in on last week’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Jacobs, 117 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1997) (holding that intent to harm is, in fact, an element of the offense); United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Davis and capital resentencing case McKinney v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
Pickett testified he did not know Jacob O'Brien, Christopher O'Brien, Seth Winkler, or Tyler Bumpers, and that he had not given them permission to be on his property or to hunt exotic animals or aoudad sheep on his property. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jennifer Davis persuasively argues that changing economic and social conditions allowed the courts, in trade mark cases, to abandon a view of consumers as heterogeneous and divided by class, education and income and instead to assume the existence of an average consumer whose perceptions were key. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis weighs in on Kerry v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Jacob Dean (b) Which case involved the Olympics and Lord Coe? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]