Search for: "DAVISON DESIGN "
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 11:18 am
Mar. 3, 2014) Related posts: Advertiser May Have Claims Against SEO Firm Using Undisclosed Spammy Practices Court Accepts Narrow View of CAN-SPAM Preemption but Ultimately Dismisses Claims – Davison Design v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:54 am
As a security measure, inmate phone calls are recorded and/or monitored, and the superintendent testified that phone privileges are an incentive designed to aid in maintaining good order within each secure detention facility. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:40 pm
Linda McKay-Panos Not-for-Profit LawOrganization Launched to Foster Canadian Charity LawPeter Broder Employment LawInsubordination and DismissalPeter Bowal and Laine Robson Landlord and Tenant Law Coming in April …Rochelle Johannson Family LawA Brief Primer on Child Support: Part OneJohn-Paul Boyd Criminal LawCriminal Defence Law in the North: Part TwoCharles Davison Online LawProtecting Yourself from Consumer Fraud and ScamsMargo Till-Rogers A Famous Case… [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 1:19 pm
Big Data The E-Books Are Reading You #EUdataP http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/25/technology/as-new-services-track-habits-the-e-books-are-reading-you.html … Retailers, Supermarkets, Medical Markets Dive In To Extract Information From And About Consumers http://ow.ly/rYTdJ California Privacy California’s New Do-Not-Track Law Goes Into Effect January 1, 2014, Remember To Check Your Privacy Policy For … http://ow.ly/2Clqu3 CAN-SPAM… [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:37 am
Case citation: Davison Design & Dev. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
The Court of Appeal preferred to think of Google as more like the provider of a notice board: one for which, moreover, Google provided a blogger with design tools for his part of the notice board and facilities for displaying advertisements alongside notices; and, according to the Court of Appeal most importantly, Google provided the notice board on terms of its choice and could readily remove or block access to any notice which did not comply with those terms. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:32 am
Word trade marks may be used but only in a designated font size and font face. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:53 pm
But what about, say, the Blogger platform considered in Tamiz v Google and Davison v Habeeb? [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
The last Inforrm US round up was published in November 2011 – apologies for the long delay since then. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm
As HHJ Parkes QC asserted in Davison, Blogger has, and oversees, a content policy, so the extent to which it truly is “passive” seems debatable. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am
This question was addressed in the case of Davison v Habeeb ([2011] EWHC 3031 (QB)) handed down on 25 November 2011 by HHJ Parkes QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:54 am
William & Mary Law School Dean Davison M. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:32 am
Such transfers shall be made by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation which shall consist of seven circuit and district judges designated from time to time by the Chief Justice of the United States, no two of whom shall be from the same circuit. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:24 am
The indictment charges Nijmeijer, 32, and 17 others with one count of conspiracy to commit hostage taking, three substantive counts of hostage taking, one count of using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, and two counts of conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists and a designated foreign terrorist organization. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 8:39 am
"* Photo courtesey of Simon Davison by way of Flickr Creative Commons. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:57 pm
As an overview, lawsuits are being filed alleging that the hip replacement was designed with a flaw. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:55 am
Calvert mentioned Davison and their $26 Million settlement they were ordered to pay in redress for consumers. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
The cases allege that the metal-on-metal design of the product was flawed. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:46 am
Nowhere in the Lusby Easement is there any explicit designation of the streamside boundary. [read post]
