Search for: "DAY v. SAMUELS"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Todd V. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
October 20, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we end the third quarter and enter the fall season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be both interesting and impactful. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm
Missouri came to the Supreme Court a few days later, asking the justices to intervene. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Pix credit here For those of you who have been following my step by step encounter with Jan Broekman's path-breaking book, Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2023), I am happy to announce that the entire work is now ready for review as a discussion draft.The abstract described my intentions: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called… [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:28 pm
This post was authored by Samuel J. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Godman (Samuel Agyei-Fosu) v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:05 am
” The challengers have 30 days to respond to the petitions for review filed on Friday, although they may seek an additional 30-day extension. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
EDT, the Law Library of Congress will host its Constitution Day event, a discussion by University at Buffalo School of Law Professor Samantha Barbas of her book Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:32 am
Shikunov and Samuel C. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Groff v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If the MQD is a weak clear statement rule, then it only wins the day if the relevant statutory language is underdetermined (ambiguous, vague, etc.). [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
,v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:13 pm
But two years later, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
The case, Vanderstock v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” (Jackson himself called Thomas “Uncle Clarence” after the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
It dates from an 1895 case, Milch v Westchester Fire Insurance Company.1 The case facts explain that Samuel Milch was a public adjuster with an assignment of policy proceeds that the insurance company refused to honor. [read post]
