Search for: "DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
He held joint appointments in the Law School and in the History Department. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
He held joint appointments in the Law School and in the History Department. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
[UPDATE : Office for Judicial Complaints now investigating Coleridge J - see end 5pm 15 May] This weekend I listened to Coleridge J talk about his Marriage Foundation at the FLBA Cumberland Lodge weekend…. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
As I mentioned on each occasion, those remarks of mine, in turn, grew out of two strong and thoughtful speeches on law and national security—one by Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism John Brennan here at the Harvard Law School last September, and the other by Defense Department General Counsel Jeh Johnson at the Heritage Foundation last October. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
The majority views this line of cases as reflecting a basic, foundational point about democracy: that there is a right to participate in electoral campaigns to persuade voter [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decision, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
Department of State.? [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
While the Justice Department has had its share of success stories and Walter Olson's blog post at Cato@Liberty lists a few large monetary r [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
But for purposes of this installment, we reference the Downie & Schudson plan because of its call for fees on ISPs as one method of financing media going forward.) [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
They therefore made no recommendation in respect of this class of prisoner.The recommendations put forward for remand prisoners were implemented in the Representation of the People Act 2000.4 The Act did not make provision for the enfranchisement of convicted prisoners, who remain disenfranchised under s3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, as amended.It is clear that successive governments have held the view that prisoners convicted of serious crimes which have warranted… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules… [read post]
