Search for: "DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. JONES" Results 61 - 80 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Uncivil behaviors and language that interfere with the privacy, health, welfare, individuality, or safety of other persons are not permitted. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Uncivil behaviors and language that interfere with the privacy, health, welfare, individuality, or safety of other persons are not permitted. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
 Still, police departments across the country deployed staggering levels of violence against protesters. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
” Lastly, based on the evidence the states presented, including findings presented in the previous litigation and those articulated above, Judge Jones affirmed that the states had sufficiently shown that they would suffer irreparable harm if 3-D gun blueprints became widely available on the internet due to negative implications for national security and public safety. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” Judge Jones cited national security and public safety concerns, such as the ability for terrorists or criminals to obtain guns through 3D-printing without the government’s knowledge. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
This is true even where she violates her fiduciary obligation in favour of the safety of a third party (assuming no exception applies). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Michael Lowe
When LEAs fail to honor immigration detainers or requests for notification and release removable aliens, it undermines ICE’s ability to protect public safety and carry out its mission. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after March 22, March 29, April 12 and April 18 conferences)   Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:10 am by Jeff Welty
House Bill 41 provides in part that “[t]he North Carolina Department of Public Safety, in consultation with local law enforcement agencies, the courts, and other appropriate local entities, shall conduct a pilot program for the use of [GPS] tracking devices on domestic violence offenders. [read post]