Search for: "DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED." Results 61 - 80 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2008, 8:01 am
The general rule is that a case becomes final after judgment and sentence is entered and an appellate decision affirming the conviction has been made or the time for taking an appeal expires without perfection of an appeal or after the voluntary dismissal of such an appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 8:01 am
The general rule is that a case becomes final after judgment and sentence is entered and an appellate decision affirming the conviction has been made or the time for taking an appeal expires without perfection of an appeal or after the voluntary dismissal of such an appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:42 am by Jeff Welty
It’s interesting to me that the Supreme Court has decided to address the issue itself rather than remanding it to a lower court. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:07 pm by PaulKostro
In multi-defendant cases, where at least one defendant has been served, the case may be restored within 60 days of dismissal by consent order, within 90 days of dismissal upon motion demonstrating good cause, and, thereafter, only upon motion demonstrating “exceptional circumstances. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm by MBettman
Student Contributor Cameron Downer has written this summary of the significant aspects of the case. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
In this case, the district court rejected the certification because the government denied that the alleged tortious incident occurred (and thus how could it have been within the scope of employment) and remanded the case to state court. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
What rules and laws apply for a case that has been removed? [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. is an important case on the Supreme Court’s docket that employers absolutely need to monitor. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Hirshfeld has now been standing-in as director for more than one year — on the  four-year-timeline of the Presidency, this is starting to appear permanent. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:22 am by Steve Kalar
   The good Prof. has been right before: here’s hoping his prediction is off the mark, this time. [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:22 am by John Jascob
That case, however, was ultimately sent back to the Second Circuit to consider arguments raised during merits briefing; the circuit court in turn remanded the case to the trial court. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm by Anna Christensen
After the BIO has been filed, Mr. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
(a) Because the founding era's statutes and common law do not support Moore's view that the Fourth Amendment was intended to incorporate statutes, this is "not a case in which the claimant can point to a 'clear answer [that] existed in 1791 and has been generally adhered to by the traditions of our society ever since,'" Atwater v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
This afternoon, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument on the biggest case on its civil docket, In re Pension Reform Litigation. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:00 am by Jason Rantanen
As I’ve done for the last few years, below I provide some statistics on what the Federal Circuit has been doing over the past year. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 8:21 am
With today’s order list, the Texas Supreme Court granted four new cases to be heard in the fall and, at the same time, resolved three cases from its pending docket. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
  As always, it lists the petitions on the Court’s paid docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted. [read post]