Search for: "DOES 1 - 42 v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP "
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2013, 8:00 pm
United Airlines v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:48 pm
United Airlines v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
[1] James T. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
The child had Malaysian citizenship and had resided in Singapore from birth until the respondent removed the child to the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The Quebec Court of Appeal held that s. 3 of the SIA is a complete codification of state immunity and exceptions thereto: “[42] The Estate and some of the interveners invite us not to adopt the interpretation of s. 3(1) the SIA which the Court of Appeal for Ontario favoured in Bouzari v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:08 pm
This condition is considered satisfied if: (1) it is the agency’s policy or practice not to enforce the departure of aliens in a particular category; or (2) it appears that the federal immigration agency is permitting the alien to reside in the United States indefinitely. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Like Vance v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 2:29 pm
First, it does not represent the solution to a duty owed to the government as a condition of citizenship. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:00 am
In Newhall v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
McChesney & John Nichols, authors of the new book The Death and Life of American Journalism, call a “Citizenship News Voucher. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:53 pm
For example, the U.S. tax treatment does not tax active foreign income until it is repatriated back to the United States, generally in the form of div [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Just because the American people sometimes make choices that policymakers find distasteful, it does not mean that citizens don’t have good choices at their disposal. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services within DHS. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:04 am
Brown, 3:08-CV-01206 (CSH); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT; 2009 U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:15 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
United States, No. 06-0218 "Order holding that appellate counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to inform client of his right to file certiorari is affirmed where: 1) counsel was retained, not appointed, and thus the Criminal Justice Act does not apply; 2) petitioner's other arguments were without merit. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
[[Page 18946]] An F-1 student in post-completion OPT, therefore, does not have to leave the United States within 60 days after graduation, but is authorized to remain in t [read post]
