Search for: "DOES 1-82"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 159873/22 Appeal No. 1987 & M-2024-01240 Case No. 2023-05198 [*1]In the Matter of Jose J. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
”“There is therefore an adverse effect if the result of the decision as defined by its order does not come up to the party’s request (T 244/85 [3], T 114/82, T 115/82, Benkard-EPÜ, loc. cit.). [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:38 am
An appellant who gives a debit order for payment of the reduced appeal fee even though it clearly does not meet the conditions of Rule 6(4,5) EPC commits an obvious mistake in the meaning of J 8/80 and G 1/12. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:50 am
The Board, however, pointed out that Rule 2.196 does not apply to Rule 2.120(f)(1), because the latter rule does not fix a particular day by which a motion to compel must be filed, but instead requires that the motion be filed before the day another event (pretrial disclosures) occurs. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
However, it does not relate to national patents. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 6:17 pm
Québec (Attorney General), 82 One day s. 7 may be interpreted to include positive obligations. [read post]
18 May 2013, 7:09 pm
Section 82 will allow you to appoint a trustee for a beneficiary of a benefit plan. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
La Corte sostuvo que:1. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:48 am
What does this mean? [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Eifit LLC, Opposition No. 91264393 (April 1, 2022) [precedential]. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:28 pm
In this [part]: Uniform Probate Code (1) As used in sections other than Section 2-205, “decedent’s nonprobate transfers to others” means the amounts that are included in the augmented estate under Section 2-205. (2) “Fractional interest in property held in joint tenancy with the right of survivorship,” whether the fractional interest is unilaterally severable or not, means the fraction, the numerator of which is one and the… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
When Plattsburgh refused to provide disabled police officers §207-a benefits, the union demanded that the resulting grievances be submitted to arbitration, Plattsburgh objected to arbitrating the issue and in an effort to obtain a stay of the arbitration, the City contended that the disputed contract provision:1. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
When Plattsburgh refused to provide disabled police officers §207-a benefits, the union demanded that the resulting grievances be submitted to arbitration, Plattsburgh objected to arbitrating the issue and in an effort to obtain a stay of the arbitration, the City contended that the disputed contract provision:1. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
So the words “human rights claim” as they appeared in s 82(1)(b) following amendment had to be interpreted without reference to rule 353 and hence any second or subsequent submission which was a “human rights claim” under s 113(1) of the 2002 Act attracted a right of appeal under s 82, irrespective of whether the decision-maker accepted that it was a fresh claim within the meaning of rule 353. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
The racial/ethnic variation among this group is quite broad: 1 in 15 African-American children has a parent in prison, as does 1 in 42 Latino children and 1 in 111 white children. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
We conclude that: (1) Newman v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:36 pm
Kee, 2012 BCSC 1210 at paras. 82-93 and Li v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
The wording of Article 82(1) GDPR requires ‘damage suffered’ as one of three conditions of compensation. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:21 pm
Where does the District of Hawaii, conceptually rendered above, stack up? [read post]
6 May 2023, 1:03 am
The Judgment may not however entirely have put the matter to bed, since it does not contain a clear statement on what may constitute “non-material damage” for the purposes of Article 82(1). [read post]