Search for: "DOMINIC v. ANDERSON" Results 61 - 80 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Anderson-Wiley, 664 F.3d 865, 882 (11th Cir. 2011) (Pryor, J., concurring) (noting this as an example). [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by SHG
And earlier this year, in the similarly no-chance Doe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
In Schroeder Music Publishing v Macaulay [1974] 3 All ER 616 the Court found that a contract with an extended term with no obligation on the publisher to exploit the works of the creator was in restraint of trade". [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Policy Report: European Union Competencies in Respect of Media Pluralism and Media Freedom Dominic Grieve, speech: Trial by Google? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Dominics Hospital (ventilator) Trial2002-05-06 Fowler v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
Dominics Hospital (ventilator) Trial2002-05-06 Fowler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm by Larry Downes
But those details aside, there is one crucial difference that Anderson acknowledges. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
At the time, that looked like it would be ruinous for many service providers (perhaps for all but the unimaginably wealthy, will-surely-dominate-forever America Online). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm by luiza
While healthcare recoveries dominated the Top Ten, two of the top five recoveries involved government contracting fraud. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm by Jim Sedor
Some lobbyists applauded the move for forcing a male-dominated industry to think about its hiring practices. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 3:07 pm
The language of human rights is the dominant moral vocabulary of the day, and the ability of religious traditions to participate in serious political discourse would be undercut if human rights were to be rejected in toto. [read post]