Search for: "Daniel Perez v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
-- Could the Religious-Liberty Principle that Catholics Established in Perez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:49 am
In Perez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
” Briefly: At the Ogletree Deakins blog, John Martin discusses the Court’s recent grant of certiorari in Perez v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Defense Attorneys: Matthew Scott Owen and Daniel S. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Jerry KangForgotten Lessons on Race, Law, and Marriage: The Story of Perez v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:16 am
The association asserts that Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez and his predecessor Hilda Solis have “rejected repeated entreaties from HR Policy and other major business groups to collaborate with the Department to find consensus among the key stakeholders on how best to improve the achievement of the goals of Section 503. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:29 am
1.United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:19 pm
Most recently, in 2004, the Supreme Court echoed this point by concluding, in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:40 pm
Amazon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Waco Tribune-Herald by Cindy V. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:51 am
Posted by Daniel J. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Waco Tribune-Herald by Cindy V. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Daniel Brinks, University of Texas at Austin, EEUU36. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Attorney Daniel Bernstein. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
DANIEL P. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:50 am
By Daniel P. [read post]
