Search for: "Daniel v. Daniel"
Results 61 - 80
of 8,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:23 am
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
In Meinecke v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision in Meinecke v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am
Conversely, the Artpusher case resulted in a ruling against the gallery, emphasizing that trademark law does not harbor a parody exception akin to that in copyright law, marking a clear boundary for artists and commercial entities alike regarding the use of trademarks in art, especially for commercial purposes.In the Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:14 am
If you’ve (understandably) lost track of the trials Trump is facing, this one is about the hush money payments that went to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am
" They draw on their significant body of work on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the Marrakesh Treaty to analyse the recent South African constitutional case, Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
ICJ Hearings in Nicaragua v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
” Danielle Paquette and Molly Hennessy-Fiske report that “Arizona Supreme Court issues near-total ban on abortion. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:33 am
It is styled, Benbow v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
The case, New York v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
Hunter (Daniel) v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm
Back in 1997, she and Professor Daniel Farber wrote a book, Beyond All Reason, critiquing Critical Race Theory. [read post]
