Search for: "Daniel v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security" Results 61 - 80 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Author's Note: Navy and Coast Guard ships require probable cause to board non-U.S. flagged vessels, and probable cause to search non-public areas of U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Department of Homeland Security to deport individuals seeking entry to the United States from Mexico while their applications for asylum are evaluated. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 3:40 pm by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
In fact, just receiving these benefits at all – fraud or not – could be grounds to deny one’s Green card application, according to a new proposal offered up by the Homeland Security Department. [read post]
Anderson on developments in foreign relations and international law, Stephanie Pell on cyber issues, Alan Rozenshtein on social media and content moderation, Daniel Byman and J. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Then-Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly rescinded the DAPA policy in June. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
  Supporters of a ban, like Michael Daniel, president of Cyber Threat Alliance, argue that a ban is needed “to break this cycle and deprive the ransomware ecosystem of ‘fuel. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:45 pm
" The article indicates that the Obama administration is not happy with the present bill as Republican House members are resisting giving any further control over cyber issues to the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm by Ashoka Mukpo
” Defenders of the MPP say the program is necessary to weed out fraudulent asylum claims, and when it was unveiled former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Neilsen made reference to “aliens trying to game the system. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
In 2014, Abdulla was convicted of aggravated fraud, and the Department of Homeland Security used that conviction as a basis for initiating removal proceedings. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  As a brief Justice Department motion, filed with the Supreme Court in the Mohammed case, put it, this is information that must be withheld “because public disclosure of that information may cause diplomatic and potential security harm. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck previews his testimony this morning before the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. [read post]