Search for: "Daniels v. Said"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm
Then, Clark sold his company which, for the last few years, is controlled by private equity giant, Daniel Snyder (who also owns the Washington Redskins). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:19 am
This was held last week before Mr Daniel Alexander KC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm
Cf. the pompous, confused, Delphic, and ultimately verging on useless analysis that Justice Cardozo offered in Welch v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:44 am
I was pleased to attend oral argument today in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
No, said the judge. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 2:08 pm
*** Judges Pierre Leval and Christopher Droney and Southern District Judge John Koeltl, sitting by designation, said Daniels erred in finding personal jurisdiction in Sokolow v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:33 am
Archer Daniels Midland Co., a class action against Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Cargill Inc. over alleged price-fixing on high-fructose corn syrup used in soft drinks and baked goods.The Supreme Court, in the linked decisions Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:14 am
Daniel F. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:57 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:08 am
Daniel F. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm
I highly recommend Major Daniel Froehlich’s article, The Impact of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Hodges Should Have Said, Concurring Opinion, (in What Obergefell v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:13 am
Raess, M.D. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses last Wednesday’s oral argument in Corley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:19 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the Ninth Circuit was wrong in concluding that the toy was entitled to First Amendment protection under Rogers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 12:23 pm
Updating this ILB entry from August 18th, referencing the August 15th Court of Appeals ruling in the case of Rick Cook & Daniel Funk v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 5:57 am
When plaintiff told Daniels-Rivera that she had not told her there was anything wrong with her work, Daniels-Rivera said there was "nothing wrong with your work, but she "wasn't implementing my vision. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:41 am
We’ve seen this before, most recently about a year ago in the H&M v. [read post]
