Search for: "David Hricik"
Results 61 - 80
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 9:06 am
- DC Read Hricik on Ethics at Patently-O: http://patentlyo.com/hricik See Hricik’s new Bio: http://www.taylorenglish.com/attorneys/david-charles-hricik/ = = = = = [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:12 am
Hricik brings with him more than 25 years of experience handling patent infringement suits and complex commercial litigation. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:12 am
Hricik brings with him more than 25 years of experience handling patent infringement suits and complex commercial litigation. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:53 am
" In an NYT op ed from June 2013, Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader, along with Professors Colleen Chien and David Hricik, noted that section 285 gives judges the power to award attorney fees to deter patent trolls but that it is rarely done. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:26 am
Article. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
David Hricik (Mercer, Law) has posted to SSRN a useful paper for judges, but also for the rest of us interested in how their ethics are affected by new technologies (and how to deal with lawyer ethics of using tech).... [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:10 am
Tomorrow: David Hricik on Patent Lawyer Ethics: http://tinyurl.com/l2e238a. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
The Job Board remains quite active as does David Hricik’s Ethics site. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:05 am
David Hricik posted about the case below. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:14 am
By Dennis Crouch On his side of the blog, Professor David Hricik again raises the question of whether Section 101 can serve as the basis for a defense to patentability. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
Welcome back David Hricik! [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:32 am
Guest post by Professor Jonathan Masur, University of Chicago School of LawThe excellent op-ed published last week by Chief Judge Rader, Colleen Chien, and David Hricik has re-ignited the debate surrounding attorneys’ fee awards in patent cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
By Dennis Crouch In a recent NYTimes op-ed, Chief Judge Randall Rader joined professors David Hricik and Colleen Chien in calling for judicial action in awarding attorney fees under Section 285 of the Patent Act as well as Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:18 am
The op-ed suggests that federal judges already have the tools to impose costs on patent trolls. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
I should note that Professor David Hricik testified on behalf of Parallel Networks in the Arbitration. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:06 am
We were excited to see a “Patent Ethics” corner started by Mercer University law prof David Hricik, but sorry to see it go on hiatus during his clerkship. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:14 am
In his recent essay, Professor David Hricik explained his position that Section 101 challenges likely do not qualify as defenses under 282[(b)]. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
By David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
David is now blogging on patent law ethics and related topics at Patently-O, which is must reading for all patent lawyers. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:57 am
Welcome David Hricik. [read post]
