Search for: "David L. Davis" Results 61 - 80 of 673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
” Washington PostTop 10 Nonprofit Tweets: David Fahrenthold: NEW: Prosecutors charge 47 people in Minnesota with fraud on a staggering scale: they allegedly stole $240 million from federal food-aid programs during the pandemic. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 7:15 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: Scholarly ArticlesThomas Donaldson, Intrinsic Values and Human Rights: Corporate Duties Depend on Industry Values Melisa N Handl, Sara L Seck & Penelope Simons, Gender and Intersectionality in Business and Human Rights Scholarship Vivek Krishnamurthy, With Great (Computing) Power Comes Great (Human Rights) Responsibility: Cloud Computing and Human Rights Fiona McGaughey, Hinrich Voss, Holly Cullen & Matthew C Davis, Corporate Responses to Tackling Modern… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm by Bridget Crawford
Archer, New York University School of Law Aditya Bamzai, University of Virginia School of Law Lynda L. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Surveillance David Davis MP and others are calling for a ban on the Chinese surveillance camera brands Hikvision and Dahua, used by UK government bodies. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
,” History Channel, Jan 31, 2019; David Huyssen, “We won’t get out of the Second Gilded Age the way we got out of the first,” Vox, Apr 1, 2019. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Professor David Faigman and others have attempted to articulate the scientific basis (if any) for opinion testimony in health-effects litigation that a give person’s disease has been caused by an exposure or condition. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Whether the Australian court has jurisdiction to enforce the judgment against a US-based company is another question, discussed by media law experts Professor David Rolph and Dr Damien Spry here. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
” This latter meaning is confirmed by looking at other parts of the Constitution, as well as by the actions of states, both immediately before and immediately after the founding, In other words, the ISL theory fails simply because the central word ISL proponents rely on—the “L”—doesn’t mean what they think it means.The Petitioners’ Reply brief seeks to address the question of constitutional text, but does so pretty feebly. [read post]