Search for: "Davis et al v. Thomas"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Neuschatz et al., The Effects of Accomplice Witnesses and Jail-house Informants on Jury Decision Making, 32 Law & Hum. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
Title: Davis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
Acer, Inc. et al (EDTexweblog.com) Apple – HyperMac to halt MagSafe sales, hopes to appease Apple (Ars Technica) EON – Motion to compel pre-suit investigation documents and for sanctions – granted as to logging / denied as to waiver: EON Corp. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
In general, milk-related outbreaks due to E. coli O157:H7 are uncommon, but almost always associated with raw milk products when they occur (Rangel et al, 2005; Hussein et al, 2005). [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
" The Ninth Circuit announced yesterday that it would delay consideration of a gun rights case, issuing an order in Nordyke et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert/Pfizer Thomas Cona et. al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:47 pm
We've followed and written about this one for over two years: Virgin Records America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Kent School District, et al.; Kent School District, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
The two former SGC financial advisers filed Tidwell, et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
Ultimate Place, et al. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
("Zurich") provided insurance coverage to Horizon Natural Resources Co., et al., ("the Debtors") during the pendency of the Debtors' Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Stephen Harlow, et al. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
The case is Capitol Records Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Marion Hotel Partners, LLC, Dimple Patel, et al , a 6-page opinion, Judge Najam writes:Titan Loan Investment Fund, L.P. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOGGINS; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00368-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-20-07)08-0276 DANIEL ROEHRS, ET AL. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:15 am
Don Best Sports, et al., Judge Davis decided that patent claims directed to a "computer" and a "computer storage media" programmed to perform specific functions could be directly infringed in the United States under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
