Search for: "Davis v. Attorney General"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 5:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
The minority report draft was written by prosecutors and a member of the Attorney General’s staff. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 3:44 pm
Plus, the Attorney General doesn't think that the fact-specific nature of the panel's decision meets the en banc standards in any event. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:53 am
Davis writes: "The leading case in New York on the interpretation of attorney retainer agreements is Shaw v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
In order to ascertain whether (1) is met, the statement should be “objectively assessed by reference to how it would have been reasonably understood by those to whom it was made” (Paponette v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago [2012] 1 AC 1 at paragraph 30). [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
The Privy Council will also hear the conjoined appeals of The Attorney General v Universal Projects Limited and The Attorney General v Keron Matthews on Thursday 7 July 2011. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
Wall v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:42 am
Clients and attorneys look for ways over, around and sometimes through the principal. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:11 am
Davis v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
Verrilli is the lawyer who journeyed to Duluth but failed to convince Judge Davis to adopt a "making available" right in Capitol Records v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:30 am
Delicath, Deputy Attorney General; Jeffrey Pope, Assistant Attorney General; Brian J. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:28 am
Daraie, Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Davis. [read post]
Oral Argument Preview: Warrantless GPS Tracking Device, Revisited. State of Ohio v. Sudinia Johnson.
16 Sep 2014, 8:32 am
Davis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:33 am
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: AUSTON DAVIS COY v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 12:00 pm
That case was Davis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:21 pm
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:59 am
Davis cannot rely on the continuous representation doctrine to toll the statute of limitations as the doctrine “tolls the Statute of Limitations only where the continuing representation pertains specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice” (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001]). [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:40 am
Late last week Judge Davis entered another, which, in contrast to Soverain v. [read post]
