Search for: "Davis v. Hamilton" Results 61 - 80 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm by Jason Rantanen
Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., 370 F.3d 1131 (Fed. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Davis Wright Tremaine Blog-Proud No problem finding the blogs here. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, aptly described by the chief justice “as a Justice with extensive experience in state and local politics,” recognized this fact almost 40 years ago, writing in Davis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
The Court further clarified the meaning of 'testimonial' in Davis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The court found that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged that the defendants set up a structure whereby they profited at the expense of the stockholders, maximizing the profits at the first entity they created to the detriment of the non-controlling stockholders of another entity they created and took public (RCS Creditor Trust v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Davis, 989 F.2d 244, 246 (7th Cir. 1993) (holding that defendant could not be convicted of bank fraud where the defendant deposited into an withdrew a fraudulently obtained, but actual IRS refund check from a bank); and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  In a sense, that’s not terribly surprising, since Judge David Hamilton had previously taken the same track (if less explicitly) in his previous opinion while still on a district court judge in Hofts v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]