Search for: "Davis v. Institutional Work Committee" Results 61 - 80 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
IP Kat has a post analysing the role of technology in the monetisation of copyrighted works. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Further, the Family Procedure Rules Committee has agreed to pilot the Project’s proposals to allow legal bloggers [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Furthermore, collective bargaining agreements or other contracts or other federal, state or local laws also sometimes impose additional requirements for employers to pay higher “prevailing wages,” apply special rules for counting compensable work hours, and provide specified fringe benefits or other special compensation or protections or other wages, when the employer is a government contractor or subcontractor covered by the Service Contract Act, the Davis… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
C.S.A. 5930 in the case of Davis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:09 am
Bout and Blaine Martin, Pay Governance LLC, on Friday, September 29, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation committees, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Institutional Investors, Management, Proxy advisors, Say on pay, Shareholder value, TSR Activism and Board Diversity Posted by David A. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”·         Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”·         Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India·         Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The House of Lords Select Committee on Communications have published a report entitled “Growing up with the internet” [pdf] recommending an ambitious programme of digital literacy, minimum standards for those providing internet services and commitment to child-centred design. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Thomas Berry discusses Tuesday’s decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Article 29 Working Party have stated in a letter that they still have concerns about the Data Protection standards of Windows 10 and the personal data which is collected. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:31 am by John Lewis and Jessica Greenberg
’” On the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, Professors Chris Sagers and Joshua Davis wrote a March 13, 2017, piece for The New York Times declaring: “A chilling little bill is working its way through Congress. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The NUJ has backed the recommendations of the Committee. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial in the case of Hourani v Thomson concluded on 13 February 2017. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The fieldfisher Privacy, Security and Information Law blog has an analysis of the Article 29 Working Party guidelines on the “one-stop-shop” principles under the GDPR. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A House of Lords Committee has heavily criticised the data sharing provisions in Part V of the Digital Economy Bill; it has reported that the provisions should not be supported in their current form. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
The other amicus briefs supportive of the plaintiffs were written on First Amendment grounds, and were filed by the Cato Institute, The Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Reporters Committee For Freedom of the Press, and the Texas Public Policy Foundation. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Freedom of Information The Daily Telegraph has won a freedom of information battle to uncover advice on taking up private sector work which was given to Tony Blair by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACOBA). [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]