Search for: "Davis v. Target Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
the Byline Times had an article “Distorting Mirror: Court Exposes Corporate Phone Hacking Cover up”. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Panelists: Bill Hearn, Davis LLP Canadian SCt decided Richard v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:10 am
Fortres Grand Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Darla led the Society’s efforts on numerous topics related to shareholders and corporate governance. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am
The Task Force has already seen results, facilitating voluntary local reforms, and it takes on even greater importance in the wake of the Wayfair v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
See Mohr v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
The recent announcement that a prominent proxy advisory firm [Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS)] is urging the ouster of most of the Target Corporation directors because of the perceived “failure…to ensure appropriate management of [the] risks” as to Target’s December 2013 cyber-attack is another driver that should put directors on notice to proactively address the risks associated with cyber-attacks. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
On the UK Constitutional Law blog Paul Bernal examines website blocking in light of the recent case Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & Ors v British Telecommunications [2011] EWHC 2714 (Ch). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
In Nicki McLellan v Kent and Sussex Courier, the complaint concerned an article headlined “Saleswoman who targeted doctor’s patients and poor is exposed“. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am
Law professors Joshua Davis and Anupama Reddy suggest algorithms might provide DOJ clearer trails to litigate such collusive schemes. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, in Frank v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
In Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
Hirsh, Marco V. [read post]
