Search for: "Davis v. Target Corporation" Results 61 - 80 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:08 am
Arlen and Marcel Kahan, NYU School of Law, on Wednesday, September 14, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Agency costs, Corporate crime, Corporate liability, Deferred prosecution agreements, DOJ, Liability standards, Management, Misconduct, Non-prosecution agreement, Securities enforcement, Settlements The Law and Brexit V Posted by Thomas J. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:04 am
Gilson, Columbia University, and Alan Schwartz, Yale University, on Thursday, August 25, 2016 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Randi Morrison
See the GAO’s Report Highlights, these Bloomberg and Washington Post articles, and this Canadian Business article: How to Make Corporate Boards More Diverse. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 24 November 2015 there was a directions hearing in the case of Lakova v Tymula & Longmuir before Nicola Davies J. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 9 November 2015, HHJ Stephen Davies handed down judgment in the case of Oyston v Ragozzino [2015] EWHC 3232 (QB). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Orthogonal to this: is the consumer essentially just a source or target of general policy, and not any outcome under doctrine? [read post]