Search for: "Day v. Mccoy"
Results 61 - 80
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 1:10 pm
McCoy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
When the target attorney says that such a decision was a "judgment call" it often carries the day. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb weighs in on McCoy v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 6:29 am
Earlier this year, the court decided in Ramos v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:07 am
See McCoy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
This morning’s second argument is in capital case McCoy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 2:44 am
As held by the Court of Appeals, most legal malpractice claims accrue from the day an actionable injury occurs, even if the aggrieved party is ignorant of the wrong (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295 [2002]; see also Flintlock Const. [read post]
Argument preview: Must a card-issuer inform a card-holder of a rate change in response to a default?
18 Nov 2010, 11:12 am
Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
In Moroney v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
In Moroney v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
In Moroney v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:31 am
The lower courts applied case law like in McCoy v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:07 am
See McCoy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 2:04 pm
" In McCoy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April 2017); English… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:51 am
Contrary to the Meighan defendants' contention, inasmuch as the plaintiff did not sustain "actionable injury" until this Court awarded the buyers specific performance in the underlying action, the plaintiff's legal malpractice cause of action against them was not time-barred (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; see Kerbein v Hutchison, 30 AD3d 730, 732). [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court, in the 5-3 decision in McCoy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The decision in Perez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:06 pm
One of my projects these days is studying the cases challenging racially restrictive covenants in Oklahoma City from the late 1920s to just after Shelley v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
McCoy a new trial in which his lawyer is his advocate, not an ally of the prosecution. [read post]
