Search for: "Department of Corrections v. Public Utilities Commission"
Results 61 - 80
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
This requirement does not apply to children housed in a Department of Corrections facility or a facility under contract with the DOC. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044 The Foundation filed suit against the Department for failure to comply with CEQA, arguing that the Department’s inaction to maintain and repair the roof of a historic former hotel that it owned was an agency decision subject to CEQA. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044 The Foundation filed suit against the Department for failure to comply with CEQA, arguing that the Department’s inaction to maintain and repair the roof of a historic former hotel that it owned was an agency decision subject to CEQA. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SUL Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
Code, § 720(a); see also Daubert v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:50 am
There was simply nothing in that utility, however, to justify affording the rule decisive weight with respect to proof of disparate impact in Title VII cases. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
Wyndham v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland has spent most of his career in public service, much like Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
A 2002 study commissioned by the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
The increase is intended to provide relief to physicians and other clinicians during the COVID-19 public health emergency. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Further, the legislative amendments to Section 25531 have “broken the once-tight link between the regulatory authority of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and powerplant siting decisions of the Energy Commission, such that the plenary power Article XII grants the Legislature over activities of the PUC no longer authorizes § 25531 (a). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Johnson, Dean of the UC Davis School of Law and Mabie-Apallas Professor of Public Interest Law and Chicana/o Studies. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
At issue was whether Title II and section 504 extended to newly built and altered public sidewalks. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
With this flows public confidence and trust in their judgment, advice and direction. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
