Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 7:10 am
Rarely does having long term care insurance lead to a negative result. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division, Second Department in Raffellini v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:21 am
By Eric Stern On July 19, 2018, the New York Appellate Division, Third Department, ruled in Roemer v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
More importantly, the Court does not discuss the impact of Martinez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
In Wieland v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 6:28 pm
Example: Jewelry Fraud Claim A recent example of a conviction for violation of Texas Penal Code 35.02 in a property insurance claim can be found in the Fort Worth case of Florez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:22 pm
By Kevin Connolly On certified question from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Texas Supreme Court, in Fairfield Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
In rejecting that argument, the Third Department reasoned that an agreement prospectively to provide certificates of additional insured insurance reflected or constituted an agreement to provide AI insurance: So long as a clear written intent to include an entity as an additional insured is manifested prior to the loss, the fact that certificates of insurance are not issued until after the loss does not compel the conclusion that such… [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
In Above and Beyond Child Care Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:05 am
Employer does not have to pay benefits to former employees guilty of embezzling William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Wright, 2009 NY Slip Op 03164, Decided on April 21, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe William Floyd Union Free School District asked Supreme Court to relieve it of its contractual obligation to provide postretirement health and dental insurance benefits to Daniel C. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:31 am
V. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
—Herb Denenberg, former Commissioner of Insurance for Pennsylvania 1Jarrett v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:36 am
—Jim Collins 1Nielsen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division, Second Department held that New York does not recognize such a cause of action. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
In 1950 respondent issued a policy of insurance on the life of John V. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
The Texas Department of Insurance allows insurance companies to exclude drivers from a policy but does require that anybody who is excluded to be named as an "excluded driver" and for there to be a signature by the person taking out the policy, to acknowledge the exclusion with their signature. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:34 am
CGL - LATE NOTICE - DIRECT ACTION - INSURANCE LAW § 3420(A)Cicero v. [read post]
