Search for: "Department of Justice v. Spring"
Results 61 - 80
of 588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 5:50 pm
In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am
Still, a number of noteworthy and significant cases argued back in the early spring are still pending after the Court issued orders waiving the 130 day rule, including cases we have written about before: Partanen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am
Still, a number of noteworthy and significant cases argued back in the early spring are still pending after the Court issued orders waiving the 130 day rule, including cases we have written about before: Partanen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:37 am
Whether it is a game-changer or not, we will report on this case again when the Supreme Court issues its decision–most likely in Spring 2016. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
This morning, the justices will hear 80 minutes of argument in one of the term’s marquee cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am
Still, a number of noteworthy and significant cases argued back in the early spring are still pending after the Court issued orders waiving the130 day rule, including cases we have written about before:Partanen v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
District Court for the Northern District of New York, Moore v Dreyer and Curley, 05-CV-1060 and Cornick v City of Saratoga Springs, Curley and Dreyer, 06-CV-0138.Dreyer served as the City's Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
The CEO never got a meeting with the Department until 15 April 1992, after trying again in the spring. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
"Interpreting Injustice: The Department of Homeland Security’s Failure to Comply with Federal Language Access Requirements in Immigration Detention," Harvard Latinx Law Review, vol. 20 (Spring 2017) [full-text]"Jennings v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Doc Berman over at Sentencing Law & Policy recently asked what "sleeper" cases at the US Supreme Court people were watching, and I mentioned that, though not a sentencing issue per se, I was interested in the outcome of of Melendez-Diaz v Massachussetts, which was granted cert this spring and will be argued this fall. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Lithwick begins by discussing the controversies brewing over calls for various justices to recuse themselves in Florida v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
For my money, the most interesting is Yates v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court written by Justice Samuel Alito that would overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 6:17 pm
That said, I am still reading court cases.I'm going to make short work of Spring Creative Products Group v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 11:05 am
History of Website Accessibility Cases In Andrews v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 4:26 am
Intellectual Property Seminar Series Spring 2013, Newman House, 86 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2http://www.ucd.ie/law/events/title,157182,en.htmlMon. 8 April 2013:Ms. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:08 pm
Do the Justices have spring fever? [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 6:19 am
Id.However, the Department of Justice (DOJ) initially wasn’t sold and filed suit to block the merger. [read post]
