Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. A. B" Results 61 - 80 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:17 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services that interpreted the Medicare provision to bar hospital from enforcing liens after the Medicare billing period expired. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am by Rob Robinson
WA Dept. of Corrections – How Much Document Searching Must Be Done? [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Department of Health and Human Services for all filings and decision in full text2. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Halse v Halse, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 850604 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:33 am by Viking
Denver Dept. of Human Services, the trial court sustained an objection to a late “notice” on both notice and 403 grounds. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm by David Ma
Could the expansion B its own worst enemy? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Supreme Court, in the case of Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:03 pm by justinsilverman
Dept. of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), which runs the NPDB, removed the file on Sept. 1 after a complaint by a neurosurgeon mentioned in Bavley’s story who believed the Star reporter misused the site’s confidential information. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The court held that the district court had the power to award restitution pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 53(b). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The positions were "unclassified" and not protected under the Tennessee Civil Service Merit System. [read post]