Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. T." Results 61 - 80 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Dec. 19, 2008)Absence of 50(b) motion in the trial court deprives Appeals Court of ability to consider AT&T's appeal from J* for EEOC on its religion (Jehovah's Witnesses)/failure-to-accommodate, discharge discrim suitDC Circuit* Adams v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 10-2204  (1st Cir. 5/13/12), aff’g Gill v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Pyett, No. 07-581Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clauseDecember 1, 2008 Argument Transcript hereSCOTUS docket hereSCOTUSWIKI hereNoted here: HR HeroAT&T v. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 9:21 am
Department of Health and Human Services, after the FDA rejected Abigail Alliance's formal request to make post-Phase I drugs available to terminally ill patients who are not clinical trial participants. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The positions were "unclassified" and not protected under the Tennessee Civil Service Merit System. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am by Lisa McElroy
New York City Dept. of Social Services, the parents could not sue unless the county had a policy or custom of depriving people of their constitutional rights. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm
By Mike Dorf In yesterday's post, I explored the light that analysis of the 9th Circuit decision in Byrd v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
"[T]he execution of a specific task is characterized as ministerial even though the manner in which it is accomplished is left to the employee’s discretion. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:03 pm by justinsilverman
Dept. of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), which runs the NPDB, removed the file on Sept. 1 after a complaint by a neurosurgeon mentioned in Bavley’s story who believed the Star reporter misused the site’s confidential information. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]