Search for: "Deschamps v. Deschamps" Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 1:28 am by Michael Geist
The Supreme Court of Canada today issued its much anticipated ruling in Crookes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am by Adam Baker
Double N Earthmovers Ltd. v Edmonton (City), 213 AR 81 (ABQB), affd [2005] AJ No 221 (ABCA), affd 2007 SCC 3, [2007] 1 SCR 116, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2007/2007scc3/2007scc3.html This case is addresses the issue of compliance with the terms of a call for tenders. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
France It is reported that the French coach, Didier Deschamps, has issued a libel claim against Eric Cantona over a 2016 Guardian interview. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC 55 at para 38, [2010] 3 SCR 211, per… [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:36 am
Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791, 2005 SCC 35, private services must be allowed to compete with the public program, citing to the fact that many countries with national health insurance systems mesh those with private enterprise and capitalism (English version of the reasons delivered by DESCHAMPS J):"In a number of European countries, there is no insurance paid for directly out of public funds. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
There has not been a successful s. 15 claim before the Supreme Court of Canada since the 2007 decision in Canada (Attorney General) v Hislop, 2007 SCC 10, [2007] 1 SCR 429. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]