Search for: "Deschamps v. Deschamps"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Double N Earthmovers Ltd. v Edmonton (City), 213 AR 81 (ABQB), affd [2005] AJ No 221 (ABCA), affd 2007 SCC 3, [2007] 1 SCR 116, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2007/2007scc3/2007scc3.html This case is addresses the issue of compliance with the terms of a call for tenders. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
Good news from on high, legally speaking:GRANTED WITH COSTS / ACCORDÉE AVEC DÉPENSSociety of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:03 pm
Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:49 pm
The decision is indexed as Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:05 am
In giving judgment for the majority, Justice Marie Deschamps accepted that “the deleterious effects of a publication ban should not be downplayed. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:21 am
National Post, 2010 SCC 16 (CanLII) contains the following line from Binnie J for the majority (McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, Deschamps, Fish, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ.: As recently pointed out in Grant v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0493, 2010 MT 74, DENNIS DESCHAMPS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:18 am
Co-operators Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm
DESCHAMPS, Respondent and Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 10:10 am
This morning the court released Alberta v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:55 pm
Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:53 pm
Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:35 am
Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:47 pm
A further concurring set of reasons authored by Deschamps J. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 11:13 am
In Bruker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 4:09 pm
McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:36 am
Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791, 2005 SCC 35, private services must be allowed to compete with the public program, citing to the fact that many countries with national health insurance systems mesh those with private enterprise and capitalism (English version of the reasons delivered by DESCHAMPS J):"In a number of European countries, there is no insurance paid for directly out of public funds. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 3:01 am
The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the Euro-Excellence v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 4:19 am
Olivotto v. [read post]
