Search for: "Dickinson v. Dickinson" Results 61 - 80 of 852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by tortsprof
From Andrew Dickinson at the University of Sydney comes news of Santa's legal troubles: On December 14, 2011, the London Civil Court of Appeal in Ducasse v Melbry Events held that Santa and/or one of his Elves had been negligent... [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:24 pm
On March 26, 2010, Penn State University, Dickinson School of Law will hold a symposium addressing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 10:36 am by Nonprofit Blogger
Here are two recent interesting decisions relating to nonprofits: DAF Donor Prevails: In Dickinson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
Nancy Welsh (nxw10@DSL.PSU.EDU) of Penn State, Dickinson School of Law has announced the following conference: On Friday, March 26, 2010, Penn State will hold a symposium addressing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:22 am
Dickinson, et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 9:36 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Perhaps the most significant Supreme Court decision in the past quarter century for the working patent practitioner is Dickinson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Ever since the Supreme Court's decision in Dickinson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- While much has been written about the effect of the post-grant review provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (2012) in invalidating U.S. patents, the change in the law most responsible for how easy it has become to invalidate patents is arguably the Supreme Court's decision in Dickinson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:40 pm by Patent Docs
LexisNexis will be offering a luncheon and CLE presentation entitled: "The impact of Therasence v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
Perhaps one reason for this less predictable negative outcome in these technologies is the countervailing (to some extent) deference the Federal Circuit has been compelled to give Patent and Trademark Office decisions on factual questions (see Dickinson v. [read post]