Search for: "Digital Advertising Displays, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
Trov, Inc., Cancellation No. 92067936 [Petition to cancel a registration for the mark TROV for "Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for collecting, indexing, storing and managing personal financial information and information relating to the user's personal and real property, sharing, bookmarking, indexing, storing, collecting and showcasing content, articles, images, and products relating to the user's personal and real property and financial… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 7:55 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
Indeed, were the display of this kind of information not immunized, nothing would be: every representation by a search engine of another party’s information requires the translation of a digital transmission into textual or pictorial form. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 11:07 am by Eric Goldman
Indeed, were the display of this kind of information not immunized, nothing would be: every representation by a search engine of another party’s information requires the translation of a digital transmission into textual or pictorial form. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  One thing we might do when advertising claims are challenged in court, then, would be to presume that a factual claim matters to consumers. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 3:23 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross
On January 22, 2019, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The Bill was to be an overhaul of the compulsory licence system that governs mechanical licences in the US, with Collins and Jeffries saying: "Under the Music Modernization Act, the digital services would fund a Mechanical Licensing Collective, and, in turn, be granted blanket mechanical licenses for interactive streaming or digital downloads of musical works". [read post]
On December 4, 2018, the New York Attorney General (NYAG) announced that Oath Inc., which was known until June 2017 as AOL Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Ninth Circuit recently addressed a similar issue in Retail Digital Network, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:41 am by Mitchell Lazarus
They paid substantial fines: Liantronics, LLC ($61,000), Optec Displays, Inc.($54,000), Boyce Industries, Inc. d/b/a VISIONTECH ($39,500), Media Resources, Inc.($19,500), Anthem Displays, LLC ($18,000), and Tradenet Enterprise Inc. d/b/a Vantage LED ($15,000). [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Finally, it was advertising-driven and did not receive any financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity. [read post]
3 May 2018, 10:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” ’ “ABC Inc advertised on their [sic] website that... [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Jesse Lempel
Likewise, the California Supreme Court affirmed in Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit deferred to the FHWA’s interpretation that the prohibition did not apply to digital billboards that periodically change advertisements. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:00 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Further, the FTC charged that, to facilitate the display of pop-up advertisements on encrypted websites, the software “used an insecure method to replace digital certificates for those websites with its own VisualDiscovery-signed certificates,” but failed to authenticate the validity of websites’ digital certificates before replacing them. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:00 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Further, the FTC charged that, to facilitate the display of pop-up advertisements on encrypted websites, the software “used an insecure method to replace digital certificates for those websites with its own VisualDiscovery-signed certificates,” but failed to authenticate the validity of websites’ digital certificates before replacing them. [read post]