Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Family Court, denied the mother’s objections and directed the mother to pay child support of $319.32 bi-weekly. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:04 am
This structure places dominant platforms in direct competition with some of the businesses that depend on them, creating a conflict of interest that platforms can exploit to further entrench their dominance, thwart competition, and stifle innovation. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
Allowing parties to avoid application of the CSDDD would run counter to its effective enforcement and therefore to the effet utile. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
And “even in the absence of an employer-employee relationship[,] one may be vicariously liable if [one] has the right and ability to supervise the infringing activity and also has a direct financial interest in such activities. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:16 am
Both parties appealed. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
" Bruen resolved the historical issue in that case by direct reference to the historical sources, with no need for experts. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:01 am
However, to secure temporary restraints, a party must first establish that it has a reasonable likely of success in its cases. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:13 am
Procedure for Securing Issuance Jurisdiction and parties When pursu [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:07 am
If any such debts exist, the creditor (garnishor) can obtain a garnishment judgment, directing the third party (garnishee) to make payments to the garnishor instead of the judgment debtor. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:02 am
This information comprises the names of the plaintiff and defendant, the birthdate of the defendant (if available to the clerk of justice), the last three digits of the defendant’s driver’s license (if obtainable), the last three digits of the defendant’s social security number (if accessible), the suit number in which the judgment was rendered, the defendant’s address or, if not indicated in the suit, the nature of citation and the date and place of citation… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
” It explains that “‘[t]he focus of a statute is “the object of its solicitude,” which can include the conduct it “seeks to ‘regulate,”’ as well as the parties and interests it “seeks to ‘protect”’ or vindicate. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Davis also owns the defendant company, IBT Media, which sold Newsweek to NW Media in 2018 structured as a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:55 pm
Although Plaintiff does not describe having received a direct threat, his Complaint alleges that Russian state-sponsored television issued an indirect threat to his life when it released a "docudrama" that "featured gratuitous violence directed at the John Doe behind the [Panama Papers] leak. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Apple) for that reason, and the plaintiffs did not even appeal the decision. [read post]
10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market
29 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Even without a direct comparative statement, if the ad targets an “obvious competitor,” that can also qualify for a presumption, and when there’s an essentially two-party market, the ad will always target an obvious competitor. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Of course, all these people would have every right to speak out against same-sex weddings, Catholicism, the Democratic Party, unions, and Israel. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Predominantly appeals to a prurient, shameful, or morbid interest; [2.] [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
Upon completion of the stock purchase, Fonn ordered more implants. [read post]
29 May 2023, 8:48 pm
Plaintiff demonstrated that it followed the procedure to exercise the right to purchase defendants’ membership interest. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:23 pm
The original English decision shows that the parties were, on the one hand, two Saudi nationals (defendants in the UAE proceedings; hereinafter, “Y1 and 2”), and, on the other hand, six companies incorporated in Saudi Arabia, Anguilla, and England (plaintiffs in the UAE proceedings, hereinafter “X et al. [read post]
