Search for: "Disney Enterprises Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Robert Burrell led me to two quite interesting Australian cases raising Dastar type issues: In Christodoulouv Disney Enterprises Inc [2005] FCA 1401 (Federal Court of Australia), the plaintiff registered THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME for entertainment services and sued Disney over its movies of the same name. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
Google presentó en el juicio que se sigue entre Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., Warner Bros. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:31 am by The Editors
 Sharon and John are president and vice president, respectively, of Sensei Enterprises, Inc., a computer forensics, information technology and information security firm. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:50 am by John L. Welch
Disney Enterprises, Inc., 98 USPQ2d 1890 (TTAB 2011) [precedential].For a history of the litigation between these parties, see this Wikipedia entry. [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:58 pm by Lara
  On Monday, May 16, Jon Stewart talked about Disney Enterprise’s application to federally register the trademark NAVY SEAL 6. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:09 am by Kevin Khurana
It is worthy to note that Playdom took ownership of the websites when it acquired Acclaim Games, Inc. in May 2010 and Disney subsequently acquired Playdom in August 2010. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:15 am by Ray Dowd
Walt Disney Co., 68 F.3d 621, 631 (2d Cir.1995), the question here is whether the infringer had any license at all. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 2:25 am by gmlevine
In a case not otherwise remarkable, the Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:30 am by admin
  In the recent cybersquatting case of Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll aka Joe Comeau FA1336979 (Nat. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again: Two… [read post]