Search for: "District of Columbia v. Ross"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The network expanded dramatically as the CMLP promoted the concept of pro bono media law services, eventually reaching the point where the OMLN's member attorneys included hundreds of law firms, individual attorneys, and legal clinics, with members in all fifty states (plus the District of Columbia) and affiliations with international media law networks. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The network expanded dramatically as the CMLP promoted the concept of pro bono media law services, eventually reaching the point where the OMLN's member attorneys included hundreds of law firms, individual attorneys, and legal clinics, with members in all fifty states (plus the District of Columbia) and affiliations with international media law networks. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
The network expanded dramatically as the CMLP promoted the concept of pro bono media law services, eventually reaching the point where the OMLN's member attorneys included hundreds of law firms, individual attorneys, and legal clinics, with members in all fifty states (plus the District of Columbia) and affiliations with international media law networks. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:40 am
E-Gold involved a decision by the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
(S.) v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Today twelve states and the District of Columbia recognize same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
Madam Justice Allen notes, [4] On a standard of “clear and convincing evidence”, the Plaintiffs proved their claim to the satisfaction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
However, the Court noted three situations (based on historical understanding) in which Congress could give judicial power to non-Article III courts: Courts for non-state areas (U.S. territories and the District of Columbia) in which Congress is acting as both local and national government. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:37 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:21 am
In 2008, the California Supreme Court held in Ross v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Second, it could seek preclearance from the Department of Justice concurrently with a declaratory judgment action in the District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Lowell v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm
Which judge served as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia after his time on the court? [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was “wrong” in August when it reversed the drug dealer’s conviction, which was based on warrants to search and find drugs in the locations where defendant Antoine Jones had traveled. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:42 pm
The California Supreme Court reached a similar conclusion in 2008 in Ross v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 am
In Ross v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm
(Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions En banc CAFC affirms ITC decision on patent misuse in Princo v ITC (ITC 337 Update) (ITC Law Blog) (Patently-O) (IPBiz) District Court Columbia: Bilski renders claim for method of ‘computing a price to sell fixed income assets and generating a financial analysis’ invalid: Graff/Ross Holdings LLP v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Alpine Electronics of America (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: NPE patentee denied permanent injunction: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
