Search for: "District of Columbia v. Sullivan" Results 61 - 80 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2006, 4:00 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia will hold a hearing on the government's Motion for Entry of Final Judgments in deciding whether to approve the merger of AT&T and SBC and the merger of MCI and Verizon. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:20 am by Kedar
Her most recent appearance was in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
District Court for the District of Columbia denied class certification in a long-running employment discrimination case involving discretionary decision making and, in the process, expressed cogently what it now takes to satisfy the commonality requirement of Rule 23(a). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Mike Scarcella
District Court for the District of Columbia not to approve $60.8 million. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:46 am
Qiydaar Reddick SULLIVAN COUNTYCriminal Practice First Degree Sexual Abuse Charge Vacated; Judge Calls For Change in Law to Protect the Disabled People v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm by Donald Thompson
Statement of the District of Columbia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Bill 14-3 “The Miranda Codification Act of 2001”There can be no legitimate reason not to record interrogations and confessions, nor have police or prosecutors ever suggested one. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm by Tia Sewell
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
An increasing number of states have enacted or are considering enacting legislation requiring financial institutions to provide customers “fair access” to financial services. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Dominion sued in the District of Columbia, relying on D.C. law. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Marion County – Denied 18-Mar District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:26 pm
Forty-three states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government have set the maximum punishment for juvenile offenders at life without the possibility of parole. [read post]