Search for: "Dixon v. Cross" Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
The Campbells cross-appeal the court's denial of their motion for prejudgment interest and/or "delay damages. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
The Campbells cross-appeal the court's denial of their motion for prejudgment interest and/or "delay damages. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Through these cases the High Court elected not to follow the English approach (see Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd) which requires that another forum is clearly or distinctly more appropriate. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:27 pm
Oastler v Henderson did not give enough facts to be taken as a clear factual precedent or benchmark. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Dixon Montague, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Houston Entry Statutes: A Taking or a Free Pass? [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Stacey Dixon; and entrepreneur Ron Gula, co-founder of Tenable Network Security. [read post]