Search for: "Doe 1 v. Microsoft Corporation et al" Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton Enterprises et al (CAFC 2010-1057, -1116) precedential Tokai didn't get evidence in because of procedural error: failure to submit written reports for its experts, Jones and Sung. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
Motorola et al (CAFC 2010-1266) precedential The winning argument at district court was that six companies "each have the right to grant licenses to the patents in the field of Wireless Handsets. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And, they argue, the law that mainly was used against them — the sweeping anti-racketeering law that Congress passed in 1970 (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO) was pulled completely out of shape to try to make it cover a half-century of corporate conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
  So how does that warrant a title of “billion-dollar lawyer”? [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog) Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak) Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation -… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed… [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Microsoft indemnifies its big corporate customers, and so stepped in. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG)   Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: EPO sets deadline for presidential applications; Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) (IAM) ECJ: Dutch brewer allowed to use Italian BAVARIA trade marks despite ‘Bayerisches Bier’ (Bavarian Beer) PGI: Bavaria NV and Bavaria… [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
  Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA:… [read post]