Search for: "Doe Defendant 19" Results 61 - 80 of 10,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
  A Legal Analysis of Hong Kong’s New Safeguarding National Security Ordinance and What it Means for Lawyers[1]Jointly issued by Asian Lawyers Network, The 29 Principles and Lawyers for Lawyers26 April 2024On March 19, Hong Kong’s Legislative Council (LegCo) passed the “Safeguarding National Security Ordinance” (SNSO)[2] popularly known as Article 23 or the Article 23 law, referring to Article 23 of the Basic Law, which calls on the region to pass… [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The lawsuit alleged the Pennsylvania Department of Health hired Insight to provide staffing for COVID-19 contact tracing and paid Insight using federal funds from the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2024, 11:48 am
In this case not so much as a morality story about the preservation of a society unwilling or unable to defend itself and protect its values, instill loyalty and commitment to its values, enhance the solidarity of its mass organs in principle and action. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:38 am by Holly
  It came up as a bullet to Guiding Principle 2, which states “Merely recognizing a problem or having a general goal or research plan to pursue does not rise to the level of conception. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The Seventh Circuit further commented that although Rule 23(e) does not require judicial approval to settle or dismiss cases brought as class actions, yet not so certified — an issue it invited the rules committee of the Judicial Conference to consider — through its mandate in §78u–4(c)(1), the PSLRA supplies a mechanism for review of the underlying merit of a supplemental disclosure case and mootness fees. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
(Complaint ¶¶ 10-11).The factual allegations provide a chronology of the genesis of the defendants from and connected with the Muslim Brotherhood and its Palestine Committee alleged to serve as a funding source for Hamas and to advance their joint political religious and ethnic objectives in the regions (Complaint ¶¶ 19-41). [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Even under Pfizer, the McKesson court noted, “a defendant’s knowledge of his general legal obligations is not enough if he does not also know that his actions violate those obligations. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:18 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Chan, J.) entered on or about April 8, 2022, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendant 316 Bowery Realty Corp. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 9:40 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
American Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457 (2001) (Congress does not “hide elephants in mouseholes”). [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Florida, 23-5173Issue: Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged with a felony (rescheduled before the Dec. 1, Dec. 8, Jan. 5, Jan. 12, Jan. 19, Feb. 16, Feb. 23, Mar. 1, Mar. 15, Mar. 22 and Mar 28 conferences; relisted after the Apr. 12 and Apr. 19 conferences) Crane v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
All material events pursuant to the arrangement took place when the defendant was still based in Singapore and the defendant’s investment manager was a Singapore company. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 1:31 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
The franchisor assets a claim against its franchisee for violating a non-compete provision and, in turn, the franchisee attempts to defend the claim by asserting the franchisor has no legitimate business interest in protecting the goodwill of a franchise. [read post]