Search for: "Doe II" Results 61 - 80 of 28,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It calls for “death by stoning in the case of a ‘wayward son’ who does not heed his parents’ discipline. [read post]
16 May 2024, 11:56 am by Dirk Auer
It does, however, suggest that the cost of false positives is particularly high in key industries like AI. [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
That does not bode well for future presidents who are working in a country often sharply and, at times, bitterly divided. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
Figure 1: Execution and Clearing As illustrated, clearing a derivative may create four (rather than just two) financial relationships: (i) obligations between Counterparty A and FCM 1, (ii) obligations between FCM 1 and the clearinghouse, (iii) obligations between the clearinghouse and FCM 2, and (iv) obligations between FCM 2 and Counterparty B. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:02 am by Kevin LaCroix
Furthermore, in liability proceedings the burden of presentation and proof for their dutiful conduct and lack of fault lies with the management board members (cf. section 93 II 2 German Stock Corporation Act). the so-called ARAG doctrine of the German Federal Court of Justice (is another driver of directors’ liability under German law: According to the ARAG-doctrine, the Supervisory Board is generally obliged to assert claims for damages against members of the Management Board. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He further argues that he is entitled to nominal damages, but the complaint does not expressly seek such relief. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal endorsed long sentences for two non-violent activists who closed the Queen Elizabeth II bridge on the M25 in October 2022. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
These UPCKats have heard that the UPC does not accept provisional applications for confidentiality before lodging the confidential information, as this is not in line with Rule 262A.3RoP. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
 If the Court adopts the rule that only core Article II functions are shielded from prosecution, then the procedural pathway on remand is straightforward. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following joinder of issue by respondents, Supreme Court found that "it does not appear that the [APA] board had sufficient information" to consider possible alternative methods of EWM remediation instead of ProcellaCOR or to determine whether to hold an adjudicatory hearing, largely due to the APA staff presentation being rushed, inaccurate and one-sided; Supreme Court held — although acknowledging there were no directives stating otherwise — that staff presentations… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following joinder of issue by respondents, Supreme Court found that "it does not appear that the [APA] board had sufficient information" to consider possible alternative methods of EWM remediation instead of ProcellaCOR or to determine whether to hold an adjudicatory hearing, largely due to the APA staff presentation being rushed, inaccurate and one-sided; Supreme Court held — although acknowledging there were no directives stating otherwise — that staff presentations… [read post]