Search for: "Doe et al v. Obama et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
That rationale does not apply to online platforms. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
Filburn et al were left untouched.) [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
Khouli et al., and resulted in the repatriation of artifacts to Egypt during the MoU signing ceremony this week, including a mummy's hand.Cultural objects covered by the new MoU's import restrictions may legally pass through America's borders when accompanied by either an export permit or proof showing that the artifacts left Egypt before the adoption of US import regulations. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:31 pm
The lawsuits – one filed by a coalition of twenty-one states (State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:41 am
The lawsuits – one filed by a coalition of twenty-one states (State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
The lawsuits (States of Nevada, et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Of course, if the Obama Administration intends to request Senate confirmation of Hesse and William J. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
U.S. et al. are very much a part of the 2016 presidential contest. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:04 pm
The Little Sisters et al. said that they were burdened, the Court and the government didn’t seem to want to second-guess this, and so we had to move on to the rest of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA): compelling interest, least restrictive means. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/MttuW4VIao -> U.S. tech firms urge presidential candidates to embrace trade, high-tech visas – https://t.co/m5WsBeamP7 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-05-04 https://t.co/EwGQ37lxDZ -> What Canadian case law can teach U.S. courts about digital privacy https://t.co/BUDOzQAKO7 -> No liability for infringement by Nortel in software sale Re Nortel Networks Corporation et al, 2016 ONSC 2732 https://t.co/avMPf0oUTf -> Achieving the $1 trillion… [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
Mark Janus, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
There must not have been much lounging in a faculty lounge with Scalia, Posner, Epstein, Easterbrook, Sunstein, Stone, et al. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
Christensen, Nos. 08-50531, et al. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
Rumsfeld, et al. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
Knowles v. [read post]
