Search for: "Doe et al v. University Of The South"
Results 61 - 80
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
Matthew Schaefer, et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Riverside Health System, et al., 2016 IL App (3d) 150445 (Oct. 6, 2016). [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Riverside Health System, et al., 2016 IL App (3d) 150445 (Oct. 6, 2016). [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am
Christa Rautenbach, North-West University (South Africa)· Developments in Child Custody under Customary Law in Nigeria and South AfricaKagiso A. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:13 am
An interesting trade mark infringement/fair use decision was delivered on 19 April from a Kentucky district court (Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. et al. v Kentucky Downs LLC & Encore Gaming) having to do, of course, with horse racing. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 9:20 am
Doe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Apple Inc., et al., No. 15-842 (IPR institution decisions unreviewable, even when addressed in a final written decision by PTAB) Alps South, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:19 am
It is this limited approach that has informed the Human Rights Committee’s decisions in cases like Länsman et al v Finland (1994) where it found that the Sami’s cultural rights are only infringed when the environment is damaged to the point of jeopardizing their survival. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
In Buck v Morris et al., 2015 ONSC 5632 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action arising out of a “Statement from the Town of Aurora Counsel”. [read post]
