Search for: "Doe v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the regulation. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
Mehta said Feb. 23 for the US District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
Larry Kramer, a widely respected legal scholar and historian who was my constitutional law professor at N.Y.U. 20 years ago, called it quits in 2008, on the heels of the Supreme Court's divisive decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Smith has explained, under District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
One impetus for Bruen was over a decade of judicial underenforcement of the Second Amendment following District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” What purpose does the language serve? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
But "does racist history count"? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
So, for example, in BMW of North America v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
” Justice Eddins is referencing District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled on Tuesday that executive immunity does not shield the former president from criminal prosecution based upon his alleged efforts to undermine the results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
” Before addressing the substance of the argument itself, it’s important to distinguish it from another, more draconian “non-self-execution” argument that no party is making but that has been prominent in some public discussions of the case—namely, that Section 3 does not apply to disqualify anyone from any office absent congressional legislation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
In its 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am
" Doe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
The case was argued in the District Court of the District of Columbia and appealed. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Then, in Liapes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that result, but on a different rationale. [read post]
